Instruments · What it actually measures
The only common series on a chart that is not a transformation of price — which makes it the only one that can contain information price does not already have. It is also the one most people read backwards, because it does not measure pressure. It measures how many people changed their minds.
Companion to the pattern series — ascending triangle, ascending channel, rising wedge, falling wedge — where volume does most of the confirming work.
This has to come first, because almost every popular description of volume is built on a mistake that a single sentence removes.
Every share that was sold was bought. Every contract that was opened was opened by two people taking opposite sides. Volume counts transactions, and a transaction has a buyer and a seller in exactly equal measure, always.
So "heavy buying volume" is not a thing that can exist. A day with ten million shares traded is a day on which ten million shares were bought and ten million shares were sold. Volume cannot be bullish or bearish on its own, and any reading that treats it as a force pushing price in a direction is describing something that is not there.
Volume does not measure pressure. It measures how much inventory changed hands — how many people, at that price, decided they were on the wrong side.
Three things, none of which is direction:
Everything useful in the rest of this page comes from combining volume with something else. On its own it is a number with no sign.
Volume acquires a sign only when you pair it with what price did. There are four pairings and they mean genuinely different things.
Expansion with the move
New participants arriving. Ownership is genuinely changing at these prices, which is what makes a level or a breakout durable — the population that would have sold it back has been replaced.
Contraction against the move
No new money. Price is travelling through a thin book because nobody is standing in the way, not because anybody wants it. These moves retrace easily, because nothing was actually transferred.
The same instrument through six volume regimes, which is more instructive than six separate examples because the price action alone would not distinguish them.
Ten million shares is a big number for one instrument and a quiet afternoon for another. Even within one instrument it means different things in different weeks. The raw number is not comparable to anything, including its own past.
The fix is to express every bar as a ratio to its own recent average — twenty periods is the conventional window and the exact choice matters much less than doing it at all. That single transformation is what turns volume from a decorative panel into an instrument.
The most useful thing you can do with volume is divide it by the range it produced. That ratio is the closest thing on a chart to a measure of resistance — in the physical sense, not the trendline one.
A bar that trades enormous volume and closes where it opened has done a great deal of work and got nowhere. Something absorbed all of it. A bar that trades almost nothing and moves three percent has met no resistance at all — which sounds bullish and usually means the book was simply empty.
High volume, small range, at lows
Absorption. Someone large is buying everything offered without letting price rise, because moving it up would spoil their own fill. Bullish, and it looks like nothing happening.
High volume, small range, at highs
Distribution. The same mechanism with the signs flipped — supply meeting every bid without letting price fall. This is what a top looks like from the inside, and it is uneventful.
Both of those are the same measurement. Which one you are looking at is decided by where it happens in the structure, not by the reading itself — the recurring theme of this whole series.
A description of market mechanics, not trading advice.